Replacing human labor does not equate to replacing humans. I’m arguing that humans will always need other humans. And for that reason, there’s always need for human work. This is sort of “Gödel’s incompleteness theorem”; that new innovations always yield new work tasks, job positions, and stuff for people to do. I’m basing this on historical precedence: during industrialization (starting…
Associate Professor (tenure track) at the University of Vaasa, and Adjunct Professor at the Turku School of Economics. Based in Finland.