Replacing human labor does not equate to replacing humans. I’m arguing that humans will always need other humans. And for that reason, there’s always need for human work. This is sort of “Gödel’s incompleteness theorem”; that new innovations always yield new work tasks, job positions, and stuff for people to do. I’m basing this on historical precedence: during industrialization (starting…
Associate Professor at the University of Vaasa. Based in Finland. If you'd like me to give a talk or workshop, please reach out via jonisalm@uwasa.fi.